The Three Ts Of Curation

We are always seeking and sharing information for solving our problems. How did we seek and share information on the Internet before sites like Google, Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn existed? Even email was not used at first to share links to information on the web. Communication was its primary purpose.

When I first accessed the Internet in 1995, accessing the yahoo homepage and going through a collection of articles on the page seemed like a big thing. I felt that perhaps in the future, the need to go to the library and hunt for information will disappear. And that’s where I stopped thinking about the possibilities. I didn’t think of the power of ‘sharing’ on the Internet. Then years later when I used Google for the first time, I managed to convince myself that it will be quite a while (perhaps several decades) until enough information is generated on the web that I won’t be able to find information on my own using a search engine like Google.

Well, that time has come and is fast passing by. Today we live in a frictionless world, where sharing information has become easier than saying ‘hello’ to one another in the physical or virtual world. We communicate with each other through information today. What I read and share with a friend or a colleague says a lot about what I’m thinking and want to communicate today. But do we ever stop to think if all this ‘constant and frictionless’ sharing of information is useful to the person we’re communicating with?  I am of course not referring to photos of family or personal updates that people send to each other. I’m referring to content that is merely picked up from somewhere else and sent to others.

Take Facebook for example. Before I hit the ‘post’ button on Facebook, the site doesn’t draw up a target group, which would be interested in the article that I’m about to share. Facebook doesn’t tell me who will find it relevant and timely? If Facebook managed to disengage all those friends who wouldn’t be interested and instead gave me a target group that would be interested in what I have to share today, I wouldn’t have to burden myself with the thought of burdening someone else’s wall with my content. The value of that information on both sides would then become equal. Both would be interested parties. I’m sure that as I write this post, the smart engineers at Facebook are working out a way to solve this issue.

But today, Facebook, like all the other social networking sites out there, leaves the choice of selecting content to others. The assumption is that you might just stumble upon something that you like, while not having intended to look for it.  But that was the same assumption used when I first started browsing the web. Only this time, the information is being ‘pushed’ by people I know, as opposed to being ‘pulled’ by me.

In the future, when there is an even bigger information overload and there is no time whatsoever to cherish the joys of stumbling upon information, it may make sense to have some sort of curation that helps users filter information into buckets of lets say the  ‘good’, the ‘bad’ and the ‘ugly’. Today we try and consciously ignore  the bad and the ugly.

However, the good needs to become great. And that’s where the problem lies. I define great content as targeted (to my needs), timely (it helps me with something today) and trustworthy (I can believe it enough to take action on it). These three Ts should work like a filter for me in real-time. Curation will have to deliver on these three Ts. Unless we get information that passes through this three Ts filter, we will end up spending a lot of time just sifting through more of just the good, the bad and the ugly.

Recent start-ups are attempting better and faster curation. Pinterest is one that is growing really fast. Quora is another one. There are several others. Some of them will find sustainable ways of making money and find smarter ways of curation.

For now though, my friends and colleagues have no choice but to bear the burden of my unsolicited posts.

Will appreciate your participation in this quick poll:


7 thoughts on “The Three Ts Of Curation

  1. Great post. Love the 3 Ts already.

    Few additional thoughts:

    There should be some parental controls or ideally a way to keep certain things away from kids. Presently, you are trying to show a kid a song to your child and youtube ends up recommending an inappropriate movie. This intelligence of a website MUST increase. “Targeted” should cover this aspect.

    Trustworthy portion is very important when researching some topic for business, science or academic purpose or whatever. In fact, there must be a algorithm built into google of tomorrow to rank website by this criteria. Example, presently, a post that is irrelevant to the topic at hand, if read by more people, will be ranked higher in our search than a accredited / peer reviewed post by an expert on the same topic. This problem should get solved.

  2. Great post, Amey. I totally agree with this trend. Just like you mentioned We communicate with each other through information today, there has been a substantial increase in distribution of curated content via email over the past few years. There’s a growing trend of individuals manually curating email digests based on content from various blogs and social media channels.
    good needs to become great
    There are some startups that are automating the process of curation and email such as XYDO, curationsoft. Moreover, there are even companies that are taking content their users curate and are emailing it for greater distribution like you mentioned on Pinterest, Quora.
    Overall a great post,keep up the good work!!!!

  3. Excellent post. Very thoughtful. I find though that sometimes, even the “not trustworthy” is very valuable. In the context of competitive intelligence, it’s useful to know about certain information that is really “disinformation”. In following political campaigns, this is even more significant. Ultimately, it is the reader that is the only one capable of determining the usefulness of such information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s